Can Agistment Qualify for Primary Production Exemption?
Agistment is often misunderstood because the land may have animals on it without the owner running the production activity.
Quick answer
Agistment may support a position only where the actual use satisfies the primary production requirements. Horse agistment is specifically identified by Revenue NSW as usually non-exempt.
Third-party use can be relevant, but the owner still needs detailed evidence about that use and about any non-primary production use.
What Revenue NSW will usually care about
| Stronger signal | Why it helps |
|---|---|
| Third-party operator produces saleable output | Connects the land to primary production rather than passive paddock rental. |
| Written agreement with record obligations | Gives the owner access to evidence when Revenue NSW asks. |
| Animal and movement records | Show real use across relevant years. |
| Non-production uses disclosed | Helps assess dominant use honestly. |
Warning signs to fix before relying on the exemption
| Risk signal | Why it can weaken the position |
|---|---|
| Horse agistment for riding or recreation | Revenue NSW says horse agistment is usually non-exempt. |
| Owner has no records from the operator | The owner may be unable to prove the position. |
| Flat paddock rent with no production detail | Payment alone does not prove qualifying primary production. |
| Mixed users on the property | Residential, recreational or storage uses may dilute the land-use story. |
Evidence pack checklist
A useful evidence pack should be organised so an owner, adviser or Revenue NSW assessor can see what happened on the land, who did it, when it happened and how it connects to saleable primary production.
- Agreement identifying operator, land area, animal purpose and evidence obligations.
- Operator records for stock numbers, movements, sales and animal purpose.
- Property plan showing the area used by the operator and any excluded areas.
- Invoices, receipts or reports showing production activity.
- Photographs of animals, fences, water, yards and land condition.
- Annual owner summary of third-party use and non-primary production uses.
Owner template: one-page position summary
- Operator: name, role, ABN if relevant and production activity.
- Land used: paddocks, access, water, infrastructure and excluded areas.
- Animal purpose: sale, natural increase, bodily produce or other purpose.
- Records received: movement reports, stock numbers, sales, invoices and photos.
- Risk flags: recreational horses, informal arrangements, no sale records or mixed use.
How Bundilla Beef can help
Bundilla Beef can help owners structure managed land-use arrangements with practical reporting obligations so third-party activity is not invisible when evidence is needed.
The objective is not to create paperwork after the event. It is to align the operating plan, physical land use and records so the evidence tells a clear, factual story.
Next steps
- Review any agistment agreement for evidence obligations.
- Confirm whether the animals are maintained for a qualifying purpose.
- Collect operator records before lodging or responding.
- Treat horse agistment as high risk unless specialist advice says otherwise.
Source notes
This resource was prepared using official NSW sources checked on 2026-07-06. Check current Revenue NSW guidance before lodging or responding to an assessment, notice or investigation.